z-logo
Premium
A mechanism on why slower polymerization of a dental composite produces lower contraction stress
Author(s) -
Feng L.,
Suh B. I.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part b: applied biomaterials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1552-4981
pISSN - 1552-4973
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.b.30453
Subject(s) - polymerization , materials science , shrinkage , composite material , composite number , curing (chemistry) , stress (linguistics) , flexural strength , polymer , philosophy , linguistics
It has been well documented that the rate of polymerization of a dental composite often affects its polymerization contraction stress. In most cases, a slower cure produces a lower stress. To investigate the mechanism behind this, we prepared an unfilled dimethacrylate resin sample and photocured it using two light irradiances, both with the same total irradiation energy. We measured the polymerization‐induced shrinkage from the unbonded surface of a class I restoration, contraction stress, extent of polymerization, and flexural modulus. The resin specimens cured under the two irradiances achieved the same extent of polymerization and developed an identical amount of shrinkage from the unbonded surface. But those cured under the lower irradiance possessed a lower contraction stress and a lower flexural modulus than those cured under the higher irradiance. We demonstrated that the stress level did not respond to the extent of viscous flow of the curing resin because the slower polymerization did not produce more shrinkage from the unbonded surface. Instead, the lower stress is likely due to a lower modulus of the cured resin. To explain why the cured resin with an identical extent of polymerization can have different moduli, we proposed that slower polymerization produces a higher level of structural inhomogeneity, which reduces the rigidity of the cured resin. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2006

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here