Premium
Microleakage and interfacial morphology of self‐etching adhesives in class V resin composite restorations
Author(s) -
Osorio Raquel,
Toledano Manuel,
de Leonardi Guillermo,
Tay Franklin
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part b: applied biomaterials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1552-4981
pISSN - 1552-4973
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.b.10024
Subject(s) - adhesive , enamel paint , materials science , dentin , molar , cementum , stereo microscope , composite number , composite material , smear layer , scanning electron microscope , dentistry , layer (electronics) , medicine
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the marginal leakage of three adhesive systems in Class V resin composite restorations. Two adhesive systems containing acidic primers: Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) and Etch & Prime 3.0 (E&P), were compared with a conventional water‐based primer: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SBMP). Class V cavities were made at the cementum–enamel junction of extracted human molars, which were then divided between three groups. One of the adhesive systems was applied to each group following manufacturers' instructions. Composite restorations were placed, light cured for 40 s, and polished. Specimens were then immersed in a solution of 2% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. Longitudinal sections were obtained and studied with a stereomicroscope for assessment of the microleakage according to the degree of dye penetration (scale of 0–3). Data were analyzed by Kruskal‐Wallis one‐way ANOVA, Mann‐Whitney tests, and the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test. Two specimens for each group were analyzed by scanning‐electron microscopy (SEM). Bonded interfaces of dentin were also examined by transmission‐electron microscopy (TEM). On enamel, there were no significant differences between the three groups. On dentin, CSEB showed the lowest dye penetration values among the three adhesive systems. SEM and TEM studies showed hybrid layer and resin tag formations in all groups. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 66B: 399–409, 2003