Premium
Concerns regarding nanosized titanium dioxide nasal exposure and neurotoxicity study by Ze et al.
Author(s) -
Bencsik Anna,
Lestaevel Philippe
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1552-4965
pISSN - 1549-3296
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.a.35336
Subject(s) - nanotoxicology , context (archaeology) , engineering ethics , nanotechnology , perception , psychology , materials science , engineering , neuroscience , nanoparticle , paleontology , biology
Scientific articles dealing with nanotoxicology are particularly awaited and important, as in the field of nanotechnology, a relatively new domain; they likely have a significant impact not only on our perception of the risk and danger potentially associated with nanomaterials but also on regulatory decisions with regard to their use in consumer products. Because nanotoxicology refers to the work of researchers from different domains of expertise, it appears also more difficult to secure accurate review and thus accurate conclusions. In that context, particular attention must be drawn on these studies. Still for the readers of such articles, of which most of are not experts in several aspects of nanotoxicology it would be tempting to take the messages for granted, thinking the studies are well conducted and reported with accuracy. In the case of the article by Ze and colleagues, we have noticed a certain number of critical comments that should be brought to the attention of the readers of J. Biomed Mater res A, because this study presents several problems. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 103A: 2198–2200, 2015.