Premium
Large‐diameter metal‐on‐metal total hip arthroplasties: A page in orthopedic history?
Author(s) -
Singh Gurpal,
Meyer Heiko,
Ruetschi Marcel,
Chamaon Kathrin,
Feuerstein Bernd,
Lohmann Christoph H.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1552-4965
pISSN - 1549-3296
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.a.34619
Subject(s) - materials science , femoral head , hip resurfacing , orthopedic surgery , total hip replacement , biomedical engineering , total hip arthroplasty , composite material , surgery , medicine
Large‐diameter metal‐on‐metal (MoM) bearings evolved from the success of hip resurfacing. These implants were used in revision surgery in cases with well‐fixed acetabular cups but loose or failed femoral stems, to avoid cup revision. Early data showed low rates of dislocation and potentially low wear profiles due to better fluid film lubrication. The risk of impingement was also thought to be low due to the increased head‐neck ratio. Subsequently large‐diameter MoM heads gained popularity in primary hip replacement. Recent data has emerged on the unacceptably high revision rates among patients with large‐diameter MoM total hip arthroplasties (THAs), high blood levels of metal ions, and adverse tissue reactions. The head–neck (cone–taper) modular interface probably represents the weak link in large metal heads that have been used on conventional tapers. Increased torque of the large head, micromotion, and instability at the cone–taper interface, synergistic interactions between corrosion and wear, edge loading, low clearance, and psoas impingement are the likely causes for early failure of these prostheses. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 101A: 3320–3326, 2013.