Premium
Preparation and in vitro evaluation of bioactive glass (13–93) scaffolds with oriented microstructures for repair and regeneration of load‐bearing bones
Author(s) -
Fu Qiang,
Rahaman Mohamed N.,
Bal B. Sonny,
Brown Roger F.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1552-4965
pISSN - 1549-3296
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.a.32637
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , lamellar structure , microstructure , bioactive glass , compressive strength , biomedical engineering , elastic modulus , regeneration (biology) , tissue engineering , in vivo , medicine , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
Abstract Bioactive glass (13–93) scaffolds with oriented microstructures, referred to as ‘columnar’ and ‘lamellar’, were prepared by unidirectional freezing of suspensions, and evaluated in vitro for potential use in the repair and regeneration of load‐bearing bones in vivo . Both groups of scaffolds showed an ‘elastic–plastic’ mechanical response in compression, large strain for failure (>20%), and strain rate sensitivity, but the columnar scaffolds had the additional advantages of higher strength and larger pore width. At the equivalent porosity (55–60%) and deformation rate (0.5 mm/min), the columnar scaffolds had a compressive strength of 25 ± 3 MPa, elastic modulus of 1.2 GPa, and pore width of 90–110 μm, compared to values of 10 ± 2 MPa, 0.4 GPa, and 20–30 μm, respectively, for the lamellar scaffolds. Cellular response to the scaffolds was evaluated using murine MLO‐A5 cells, an osteogenic cell line. While the cellular response to both groups of scaffolds was better than control wells, the columnar scaffolds with the larger pore width provided the most favorable substrate for cell proliferation and function. These results indicate that 13–93 bioactive glass scaffolds with the columnar microstructure could be used for the repair and regeneration of load‐bearing bones in vivo . © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2010