z-logo
Premium
Physico/chemical characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanothickness bioceramic depositions on alumina‐blasted/acid‐etched Ti‐6Al‐4V implant surfaces
Author(s) -
Coelho Paulo G.,
Lemons Jack E.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1552-4965
pISSN - 1549-3296
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.a.32097
Subject(s) - bioceramic , materials science , characterization (materials science) , metallurgy , implant , composite material , biomedical engineering , nanotechnology , medicine , surgery
The objective of this study was to physico/chemically characterize and evaluate the in vivo performance of two nanothickness ion beam assisted depositions (IBAD) of bioceramic coatings on implants in a beagle model. Alumina‐blasted/acid‐etched (AB/AE) Ti‐6Al‐4V implants were subjected to two different IBAD depositions (IBAD I and IBAD II), which were physico/chemically characterized by SEM, EDS, XPS, XPS + ion‐beam milling (depth profiling), XRD, AFM, and ToF‐SIMS. A beagle dog tibia model was utilized for histomorphometric and biomechanical (torque) comparison between AB/AE, IBAD I, IBAD II, and plasma‐sprayed hydroxyapatite (PSHA) coated implants that remained in vivo for 3 and 5 weeks. The coatings were characterized as amorphous Ca‐P with high Ca/P stoichiometries with thicknesses of an order of magnitude difference (IBAD I = 30–50 nm and IBAD II = 300–500 nm). The histomorphometric and biomechanical testing results showed that the 300–500 nm thickness deposition (IBAD II) and PSHA positively modulated bone healing at early implantation times. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here