z-logo
Premium
Antibody response to collagen after functional implantation of different polyester vascular prostheses in pigs
Author(s) -
Schlosser M.,
Zippel R.,
Hoene A.,
Urban G.,
Ueberrueck T.,
Marusch F.,
Koch A.,
Meyer L.,
Wilhelm L.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of biomedical materials research part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1552-4965
pISSN - 1549-3296
DOI - 10.1002/jbm.a.30240
Subject(s) - biocompatibility , immune system , polyester , antibody , materials science , biomaterial , immunoassay , immunology , biomedical engineering , medicine , composite material , metallurgy
Besides inflammation, specific immune responses are seen also after implantation of biomaterials. The aim was to investigate the humoral response to bovine collagen type I following implantation of various polyester (Dacron) prostheses into pigs. In 24 randomized pigs, the infrarenal aorta was replaced with a segment of collagen‐impregnated, woven polyester prosthesis of low, medium, or high porosity. IgG antibodies were detected by immunoassay using native and denatured collagen type I as a target for blood samples taken on day 1 (implantation), 10, 17, 24, 62, and 116. As generally observed, antibodies to native and denatured collagen are of low titer and were significantly correlated with enhanced binding to the denatured form ( p < 0.001). The highest overall antibody prevalence to native and denatured collagen was obtained on day 116 with 68% and on day 62 with 59%, respectively. Prostheses with high porosity induced an early immune response on day 10; those with low and medium porosity induced the highest antibody levels later after 2 months. Collagen antibodies neither correlated with serum IgG contents nor with antibodies to the prosthesis polyester matrix. Thus, humoral immune response against implant components may provide a further parameter in describing biocompatibility but also a potential marker that may facilitate monitoring of individual perigraft reaction. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 72A: 317–325, 2005

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here