Premium
Oxidant radical release by alveolar macrophages after cadmium chloride exposure in vitro
Author(s) -
Leduc D.,
Gressier B.,
Gosset Ph.,
Lheureux Ph.,
De Vuyst P.,
Wallaert B.,
Yernault J. C.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of applied toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.784
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1099-1263
pISSN - 0260-437X
DOI - 10.1002/jat.2550140511
Subject(s) - cadmium chloride , cytolysis , chemistry , trypan blue , lactate dehydrogenase , cadmium , in vitro , alveolar macrophage , pathogenesis , intracellular , biochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , pharmacology , immunology , cytotoxicity , macrophage , medicine , enzyme , biology , organic chemistry
Chronic exposure to cadmium can cause lung emphysema, the mechanism of which is unknown. Current concepts on the pathogenesis of emphysema largely emphasize the role of a protease‐antiprotease imbalance. The aim of this work was to study the effects of cadmium on the regulation of antiprotease activity and the release of oxidant radicals from alveolar macrophages. Guinea pig alveolar macrophages (AM) were exposed overnight to cadmium chloride (CdCl 2 ) in vitro. To define the cytolytic threshold dose, cell lysis was evaluated by trypan blue exclusion and lactate dehydrogenase release. Non‐cytolytic concentrations were then used (0.1, 0.4 and 0.8 ppm) to simulate chronic exposure conditions. Overnight exposure to 0.1, 0.4 and 0.8 ppm CdCl 2 decreased intracellular ATP (mean ± SD: 91 ± 8%, 72 ± 7%, 50 ± 8% of control cells, respectively), suggesting that even at non‐cytolytic doses, Cd 2+ can cause cell injury. The assessment of oxygen radical release from AM after overnight exposure to CdCl 2 showed a dose‐dependent decrease to 54.3 ± 8.2%, 32.2 ± 4.3% and 25 ± 3% of control after exposure to 0.1, 0.4 and 0.8 ppm Cd 2+ , respectively. At non‐cytolytic concentrations (0.1, 0.4 and 0.8 ppm) CdCl 2 did not decrease α 1 ‐proteinase inhibitor activity either in the absence of AM or in the presence of AM and myeloperoxidase. In conclusion, our in vitro results do not suggest that a protease‐antiprotease imbalance is involved in the pathogenesis of cadmium‐induced emphysema. However, these data should be considered in the context of an eventual increase of protease burden in the lung caused by the migration of neutrophils and macrophages into the alveolar space after CdCl 2 exposure in vivo. Cadmium, by impairing the release of oxidant radicals from AM, may increase susceptibility to respiratory infections.