z-logo
Premium
From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: what can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity?
Author(s) -
Ichino Andrea,
Mealli Fabrizia,
Nannicini Tommaso
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of applied econometrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.878
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 1099-1255
pISSN - 0883-7252
DOI - 10.1002/jae.998
Subject(s) - matching (statistics) , scrutiny , estimator , sensitivity (control systems) , econometrics , agency (philosophy) , independence (probability theory) , work (physics) , economics , computer science , statistics , mathematics , political science , sociology , engineering , law , mechanical engineering , social science , electronic engineering
Abstract The diffusion of temporary work agency (TWA) jobs has led to a harsh policy debate and ambiguous empirical evidence. Results for the USA, based on quasi‐experimental evidence, suggest that a TWA assignment decreases the probability of finding a stable job, while results for Europe, based on the conditional independence assumption (CIA), typically reach opposite conclusions. Using data for two Italian regions, we rely on a matching estimator to show that TWA assignments can be an effective springboard to permanent employment. We also propose a simulation‐based sensitivity analysis, which highlights that only for one of these two regions are our results robust to specific failures of the CIA. We conclude that European studies based on the CIA should not be automatically discarded, but should be put under the scrutiny of a sensitivity analysis like the one we propose. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here