Premium
Reimbursement outcomes of a pharmacist‐physician co‐visit model in a Federally Qualified Health Center
Author(s) -
Gonzalvo Jasmine D.,
Kenneally Allison M.,
Pence Lauren,
Walroth Todd,
Schmelz Andrew N.,
Nace Nicole,
Chang Juan,
Meredith Ashley H.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the american college of clinical pharmacy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2574-9870
DOI - 10.1002/jac5.1416
Subject(s) - medicine , reimbursement , pharmacist , ambulatory , family medicine , cohort , medicaid , health care , retrospective cohort study , ambulatory care , pharmacy , emergency medicine , economics , economic growth
Abstract Background Pharmacists have demonstrated a positive impact in providing patient care in ambulatory settings. Pharmacists have faced multiple barriers to reimbursement, especially in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) setting. A commonly cited barrier is lack of recognition as providers under Medicare. Objectives The objective of this study was to describe the reimbursement potential, physician appointment capacity, and billing levels with the use of a pharmacist‐physician co‐visit model in an urban FQHC. Methods This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. Patient visits were included in the co‐visit model cohort if they were completed with the pharmacist and/or collaborating physician on the same clinic half‐day from May‐September 2019. Comparator group patient visits were included in the physician‐only cohort if they were with one of five physicians practicing at the FQHC on a day without the pharmacist. Patient visits were excluded if the visit was nonbillable. Results Realized reimbursement per half‐day in clinic [mean (SD)], was significantly less with the physician‐only visits compared to the co‐visit billing model [$558 (242) vs $850 (410), P = .001]. The addition of a pharmacist through the co‐visit billing model increased the median (IQR) billing per half‐day in clinic from $1613 (1173, 1788) to $2108 (1832,2620) ( P < .001), and the median (IQR) number of patients seen per half‐day from 9 (7, 10) to 12 (10, 14) ( P < .001). Unpaid patient bills ($39 599) were excluded from reimbursement analysis in both groups. Conclusions The pharmacist‐physician co‐visit model in an FQHC increased revenue to justify the addition of one full‐time equivalent position within our facility, increased the number of patients seen by the physician, allowed for higher‐complexity billing, and provided physicians with variety in responsibilities. The benefits of team‐based care extend beyond the financial implications of a co‐visit model. Without direct pharmacist‐billing mechanisms, this model justifies the expansion of pharmacist‐managed services.