Premium
Quantitative analysis of nonvisit care activities performed by ambulatory care pharmacists in the outpatient primary care clinic setting
Author(s) -
Kosloski Tarpenning Kimberly A.,
McGill Sarah A.,
Peterson Jessica A.,
Yost Kaitlin J.,
Tumerman Marc D.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of the american college of clinical pharmacy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2574-9870
DOI - 10.1002/jac5.1094
Subject(s) - ambulatory care , medicine , pharmacist , ambulatory , reimbursement , psychological intervention , health care , ambulatory care nursing , family medicine , pharmacy , nursing , primary nursing , nurse education , economics , economic growth
The value of pharmacists as direct patient care providers in integrated ambulatory care teams has been demonstrated. As the reimbursement landscape changes, patient care outside of office visits is increasing through nonvisit care. Objective We aimed to quantify the time spent by ambulatory care pharmacists on nonvisit care activities in the outpatient primary care clinic setting. Methods Data were collected from four outpatient ambulatory care practices in our institution over 12 weeks. The primary objective was to quantify the time spent performing nonvisit care activities. Secondary objectives were to quantify the number of patients affected, the number of nonvisit care activities, the types of medication therapy problems (MTPs) encountered during nonvisit care activities, and the resulting medication therapy interventions. Results A total of 1311 patients were affected during the study, and pharmacists spent a daily average of 1.6 hours performing nonvisit patient care. Among 1548 nonvisit care activities, staff face‐to‐face curbside consult was the most frequent (41%). Among 1866 MTPs identified (1.4 MTP per patient), the most common problems identified were need for education (31%), adverse medication events (21%), need for an additional medication (20%), and nonadherence (12%). The most common interventions were health care team education (28%), recommendation to switch medication (18%), patient education (17%), and start a new medication (14%). Conclusion Ambulatory care pharmacists spent considerable time performing nonvisit care, with multiple MTPs identified during these encounters. Health care teams frequently used pharmacists for nonvisit patient care. Further research is needed to determine the best utilization of pharmacist resources allocated to nonvisit care in an integrated ambulatory care practice.