Premium
The effects of receptive and expressive instructional sequences on varied conditional discriminations
Author(s) -
Bao Shimin,
Sweatt Kristin T.,
Lechago Sarah A.,
Antal Sarah
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of applied behavior analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1938-3703
pISSN - 0021-8855
DOI - 10.1002/jaba.404
Subject(s) - psychology , receptive field , receptive language , expressive language , intervention (counseling) , curriculum , cognitive psychology , developmental psychology , neuroscience , linguistics , pedagogy , vocabulary , philosophy , psychiatry
Many Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention (EIBI) curricula recommend teaching receptive responding before targeting expressive responding (Leaf & McEachin, 1999; Lovaas, 2003). However, a small literature base suggests that teaching expressive responses first may be more efficient when teaching children with ASD and other developmental disabilities (Petursdottir & Carr, 2011). The present study employed an alternating treatments design to compare the effects of three instructional sequences to teach feature, function, and class to three children diagnosed with ASD: (a) receptive–expressive, (b) expressive–receptive, and (c) mixed. The results suggested that expressive–receptive was the most efficient training sequence for all three participants. Additionally, greater emergent responding was observed with the expressive–receptive training sequence.