
Addressing the Doula Paradox: An Analysis and Reimagining of a Changing Role in Reproductive Justice
Author(s) -
Krapf Jasmine
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
student anthropologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2330-7625
DOI - 10.1002/j.sda2.20200700.0005
Subject(s) - medicalization , sociology , total institution , discipline , narrative , institution , mythology , obstetrics , feminism , economic justice , harm , gender studies , criminology , nursing , medicine , psychology , political science , social science , law , social psychology , psychiatry , history , linguistics , philosophy , classics
The history of obstetrics and obstetric violence shows that, historically, midwifery has been just as safe, if not safer than in‐hospital birth. Using Michel Foucault's Discipline and Punish as a theoretical framework, we can see how hospitals, like most social institutions, function as disciplinary forces for social control. In this article, I analyze the hospital doula as an example of Foucault's docile body to demonstrate how doulas act as reformists while indirectly furthering the medicalization of birth and the marginalization of the midwife within the institution through assigned subservience and cultural assimilation. In addition to textual analysis of other scholars' work on birth and birthing in the US, I employ narrative theory and autoethnography of my several years' experience as an in‐hospital doula to reimagine the doula's role and propose sustainable and practical solutions to obstetric violence and medicalization. I argue that doulas, as midwifery advocates, can assist in shifting the birthing paradigm from obstetrics to midwifery by dispelling myths about home birth and by informing clients about the safety of midwife‐supported pregnancy and birth.