Premium
1.5.3 Lifecycle Value Framework for Tactical Aircraft Product Development
Author(s) -
Hallander Ingrid,
Stanke Alexis
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
incose international symposium
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2334-5837
DOI - 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2001.tb02364.x
Subject(s) - product lifecycle , system lifecycle , procurement , new product development , process management , context (archaeology) , product management , capability maturity model , product (mathematics) , application lifecycle management , maturity (psychological) , risk analysis (engineering) , business , knowledge management , computer science , marketing , psychology , paleontology , developmental psychology , geometry , mathematics , software , biology , programming language
Due to a dramatic reduction in defense procurement, the benchmark for developing new defense systems today is mission effectiveness at an affordable cost, i.e. best value. In an attempt to encircle a more holistic perspective of value, lifecycle value has evolved as a concept within the Lean Aerospace Initiative, LAI. The implication of this is development of products incorporating lifecycle and long‐term focus instead of a shortsighted cost cutting focus. The interest to reduce total cost of ownership while still improving performance, availability, and sustainability, other dimensions taken into account within the lifecycle value approach, falls well within this context. Several factors prevent enterprises from having a holistic perspective during product development. Some important aspects are increased complexity of the products and significant technological uncertainty. The combination of complexity in system design and the limits of individual human comprehension typically prevent a best value solution to be envisioned. The purpose of this research was to examine relative contributions in product development and determine factors that significantly promote abilities to consider and achieve lifecycle value. This paper contributes a maturity matrix based on effective practices and lessons learned through extensive interview based case studies of three tactical aircraft programs, including experiences from more than 100 interviews.