Open AccessVALIDATION OF AUTOMATED SCORES OF TOEFL IBT ® TASKS AGAINST NONTEST INDICATORS OF WRITING ABILITY
Author(s) -
Weigle Sara Cushing
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
ets research report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.235
H-Index - 5
ISSN - 2330-8516
DOI - 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02260.x
Subject(s) - psychology , test of english as a foreign language , variety (cybernetics) , task (project management) , test (biology) , writing assessment , the internet , applied psychology , computer science , mathematics education , english language , artificial intelligence , world wide web , paleontology , management , economics , biology
Automated scoring has the potential to dramatically reduce the time and costs associated with the assessment of complex skills such as writing, but its use must be validated against a variety of criteria for it to be accepted by test users and stakeholders. This study addresses two validity‐related issues regarding the use of e‐rater ® with the independent writing task on the TOEFL iBT ® (Internet‐based test). First, relationships between automated scores of iBT tasks and nontest indicators of writing ability were examined. This was followed by exploration of prompt‐related differences in automated scores of essays written by the same examinees. Correlations between both human and e‐rater scores and nontest indicators were moderate but consistent, with few differences between e‐rater and human rater scores. E‐rater was more consistent across prompts than individual human raters, although there were differences in scores across prompts for the individual features used to generate total e‐rater scores.