Open AccessA COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE‐CHOICE AND CONSTRUCTED FIGURAL RESPONSE ITEMS
Author(s) -
Martinez Michael E.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
ets research report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.235
H-Index - 5
ISSN - 2330-8516
DOI - 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1990.tb01355.x
Subject(s) - item response theory , multiple choice , psychology , test (biology) , contrast (vision) , relevance (law) , response bias , sample (material) , statistics , mathematics , cognitive psychology , social psychology , psychometrics , artificial intelligence , computer science , significant difference , paleontology , chemistry , chromatography , political science , law , biology
In contrast to multiple‐choice test questions, figural response items call for constructed responses and rely upon figural material, such as illustrations and graphs, as the response medium. Figural response questions in various science domains were created and administered to a sample of 4th‐, 8th‐, and 12th‐grade students. Item and test statistics from parallel sets of figural response and multiple‐choice questions were compared. Figural response items were generally more difficult, especially for questions that were difficult (p<.5) in their constructed‐response forms. Figural response questions were also slightly more discriminating and reliable than their multiple‐choice counterparts, but had higher omit rates. The paper addresses the relevance of guessing to figural response items and the diagnostic value of the item type. Plans for future research on figural response items are discussed.