Open AccessNONRESPONSE IN DECLARED ETHNICITY AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENTIALLY FUNCTIONING ITEMS
Author(s) -
Allen Nancy L.,
Wainer Howard
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
ets research report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.235
H-Index - 5
ISSN - 2330-8516
DOI - 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1982.tb01331.x
Subject(s) - differential item functioning , ethnic group , psychology , test (biology) , identification (biology) , social psychology , statistics , item response theory , psychometrics , developmental psychology , mathematics , paleontology , botany , sociology , anthropology , biology
The accuracy of procedures that are used to compare the performance of different groups of examinees on test items obviously depends upon the correct classification of members in each examinee group. The significance of this dependence is determined by the sensitivity of the statistical procedure and the proportion of examinees who are unidentified. Since the number of nonrespondents to questions of ethnicity is often of the same order of magnitude as the number of identified members of most minority groups, understanding the effect of nonresponse is crucial to evaluating the validity of a procedure which is used to study differential item functioning (DIF). In this study, we examined the effect of nonresponse to questions of ethnic identity on the measurement of DIF for SAT verbal items using a commonly used modern method, the Mantel‐Haenszel procedure (Holland and Thayer, 1988). We found that efforts to obtain more complete ethnic identifications from the examinees would be rewarded with more accurate DIF analyses.