z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
THE NATURE OF ESSAY GRADES IN LAW SCHOOL 1
Author(s) -
Klein Stephen P.,
Hart Frederick M.
Publication year - 1968
Publication title -
ets research bulletin series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2333-8504
pISSN - 0424-6144
DOI - 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00157.x
Subject(s) - handwriting , intraclass correlation , mathematics education , class (philosophy) , reliability (semiconductor) , set (abstract data type) , quality (philosophy) , mathematics , law , psychology , statistics , computer science , philosophy , political science , linguistics , artificial intelligence , physics , power (physics) , quantum mechanics , programming language , psychometrics , epistemology
The same one‐hour essay question was included in the final examinations in the Contracts course at 16 law schools. The professor ( P ) at each school sent to ETS five answers from his class. A Xerox copy of the set of 80 answers was then sent to each P who graded them on a five‐point scale. An analysis of these grades indicated that: (1) the students were consistent in their performance on different essays since grades on the common question (CQ) correlated .71 with their grades in the course, (2) the professors agreed with each other highly in how the papers should be graded (the intraclass correlation was .58 and the reliability of the mean grades across all P s was .96), and (3) the average grade on the CQ was significantly related to a number of other variables such as LSAT scores (.45), Handwriting quality (.25), the Length of the answer (.56), and first‐year GPA in law school (.62). The average grades assigned to the papers by two laymen and the combination of LSAT and Length correlated .63 and .68, respectively, with the P s' average grade on the CQ. The implications of these findings are discussed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here