data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c3fd/2c3fd2c05ec175716150fd2054ac6d9c19b5c66f" alt="open-access-img"
THE INTERACTION OF STUDENT MAJOR‐FIELD GROUP AND TEXT CONTENT IN TOEFL READING COMPREHENSION
Author(s) -
Hale Gordon A.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
ets research report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.235
H-Index - 5
ISSN - 2330-8516
DOI - 10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00257.x
Subject(s) - test of english as a foreign language , reading (process) , reading comprehension , test (biology) , field (mathematics) , mathematics education , psychology , comprehension , linguistics , english language , mathematics , paleontology , philosophy , pure mathematics , biology
In light of the current emphasis on English for specific purposes, it was hypothesized that a student's major‐field area interacts with the text content in determining performance on TOEFL reading passages. To assess this possibility, the present study examined performance on the reading passages in TOEFL® forms used in four operational test administrations. The results supported the study's hypothesis, as students in the two key major‐field groups, the humanities/social sciences and the biological/physical sciences, performed significantly better on passages related to their own groups than on other passages, for three of the four test forms examined. Although the hypothesized interaction was statistically significant for most of the test forms, however, the effect was relatively small, as expressed in terms of points on the TOEFL scale. Thus, a distinction must be drawn between the practical significance and the statistical significance of the interaction effect. Practically, the effect appears to be relatively small with typical TOEFL reading passages, perhaps because they are drawn from general readings rather than specialized textbooks. Statistically, however, the present results showed the effect to be a reliable phenomenon, even if relatively small in magnitude, thus supporting the theoretical view that a student's major‐field area interrelates with the text content in determining reading performance.