
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE GRE ANALYTICAL TEST: A RESOURCE DOCUMENT
Author(s) -
Duran Richard,
Powers Donald,
Swinton Spencer
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
ets research report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.235
H-Index - 5
ISSN - 2330-8516
DOI - 10.1002/j.2330-8516.1987.tb00215.x
Subject(s) - test (biology) , construct (python library) , psychology , documentation , cognition , cognitive skill , mathematics education , construct validity , resource (disambiguation) , critical thinking , plan (archaeology) , item response theory , test validity , measure (data warehouse) , psychometrics , computer science , developmental psychology , paleontology , computer network , history , archaeology , neuroscience , biology , programming language , database
The purpose of the study reported here was to plan further research aimed at understanding how the current version of the GRE analytical measure reflects cognitive skills that are important to success in graduate education. Several activities were completed, including selective literature reviews of (a) cognitive and psychometric research on reasoning and (b) more general educational research on the role of reasoning in higher education. The two analytical item types included in the current test were analyzed to determine more precisely the kinds of basic skills that underlie their solution. Based on these activities a summary was made of the major thinking and language skills that seem to be required for successful performance on the test. Two major conclusions that were reached are that (1) although there is a considerable body of research on reasoning, thinking, and problem solving, there are few well‐developed models or theories to guide the measurement of analytical ability and (2) although reasoning, critical thinking, and other such processes are assumed to be requirements of successful academic performance, there is little documentation of the specific involvement of these skills in graduate education. Based on these general conclusions and other more specific findings, further work has been planned and is proposed in a separate document.