
APPLICATION OF A NEW GOODNESS‐OF‐FIT PLOT PROCEDURE TO SAT AND TOEFL ITEM TYPE DATA 1 , 2 , 3
Author(s) -
Eignor Daniel R.,
GolubSmith Marna,
Wingersky Marilyn S.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
ets research report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.235
H-Index - 5
ISSN - 2330-8516
DOI - 10.1002/j.2330-8516.1986.tb00202.x
Subject(s) - goodness of fit , equating , test of english as a foreign language , statistics , statistic , logistic regression , consistency (knowledge bases) , test (biology) , test statistic , mathematics , econometrics , statistical hypothesis testing , psychology , computer science , language assessment , artificial intelligence , mathematics education , rasch model , paleontology , biology
The three‐parameter logistic IRT model is currently being used for equating purposes with data from multiple administrations of two testing programs at ETS: the Admissions Testing Program Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). Users of the model in these two testing programs have generally assessed goodness of fit of the model to test items by looking at item‐estimated ability regression plots. This procedure tends to be fairly subjective and quite time consuming, and as a result, little useful aggregate data have been assessed that would shed light on which SAT‐Verbal, SAT‐Mathematical, and TOEFL item types are better or more poorly fit by the model. The purposes of this study were two‐fold: 1) to systematically study the fit of the three‐parameter logistic model to SAT and TOEFL item type data, using a fit statistic formed by grouping on estimated ability and a newly suggested normal probability plot procedure; and 2) to determine the degree of consistency that can be expected when assessing lack of fit of the three‐parameter model using the fit statistic formed by grouping on estimated ability and a newly suggested fit statistic which is formed by grouping an observed number‐right score.