Premium
Discovery As A Process
Author(s) -
LOEHLE CRAIG
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
the journal of creative behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.896
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 2162-6057
pISSN - 0022-0175
DOI - 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb00730.x
Subject(s) - scrutiny , process (computing) , argument (complex analysis) , elaboration , business process discovery , computer science , scientific discovery , vocabulary , subject (documents) , event (particle physics) , data science , management science , psychology , cognitive science , work in process , linguistics , engineering , political science , humanities , philosophy , world wide web , business process , law , chemistry , operating system , biochemistry , business process modeling , operations management , quantum mechanics , physics
The study of the discovery process in science is inhibited by the assumption that discovery is an event of short duration, not subject to internal scrutiny, and by the focus on empirical studies as being the most scientific. The argument is made that discoveries are often made by a pattern recognition process. The discovery process, however, also includes the elaboration of a perceived pattern so that it may be communicated and tested. The elaboration process includes development of a descriptive vocabulary, elucidation of mathematical relations and measures, development of instruments and techniques for measurement, and deduction of testable hypotheses. Thus discovery as a process can be very elaborate and prolonged and should be amenable to explicit study. Implications of this analysis for the practice of science and for science policy are also discussed.