Premium
Clopidogrel Prescribing and Concordance with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Hospital Patients
Author(s) -
Luinstra Marianne,
Naunton Mark,
Peterson Gregory M,
Bereznicki Luke R
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of pharmacy practice and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.222
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 2055-2335
pISSN - 1445-937X
DOI - 10.1002/j.2055-2335.2009.tb00471.x
Subject(s) - clopidogrel , medicine , concordance , aspirin , emergency medicine , ticlopidine
Background Clopidogrel is used for the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Clopidogrel has a similar safety profile to low‐dose aspirin but is considerably more expensive. Clopidogrel is subsidised for restricted indications via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Aim To examine clopidogrel prescribing in hospital; and to identify patients discharged on clopidogrel according to PBS criteria. Method Cross‐sectional evaluation of patients started on clopidogrel (July 2006 to June 2007) at the Royal Darwin and Royal Hobart Hospitals. Clopidogrel prescribing was examined and the indication for discharge on clopidogrel was documented. The primary outcome was concordance between clopidogrel use and PBS criteria. Results Data were collected for 385 patients. 54% of patients from the Royal Darwin Hospital and 39% of patients from the Royal Hobart Hospital discharged on clopidogrel met PBS criteria. The main reason for noncompliance with the PBS was absence of a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events while on low‐dose aspirin and an absence of contraindications to aspirin at the time of clopidogrel prescribing. Conclusion Although clopidogrel prescribing at the hospitals was often not in accordance with PBS criteria, in most cases prescribing was based on the available evidence.