Open AccessMandatory Continuing Professional Education: Do we need it?
Author(s) -
Field Nikki
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
radiographer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 2051-3909
pISSN - 0033-8273
DOI - 10.1002/j.2051-3909.2004.tb00014.x
Subject(s) - mandate , continuing education , continuing professional development , competence (human resources) , continuing medical education , argument (complex analysis) , medical education , medicine , professional development , radiation therapist , radiation oncology , professional association , engineering ethics , political science , psychology , public relations , radiation therapy , engineering , law , surgery , social psychology
In view of the recommendations made in the “Report of the Radiation Oncology Inquiry — A Vision for Radiotherapy” that radiation therapists should prove their competence through continuing professional education (CPE) and the decision by the Council of the Australian Institute of Radiography to mandate continuing professional development for members from January 2005, it seems timely to address the CPE voluntary versus mandatory debate for medical radiation scientists. This paper explores the nature of CPE and presents an argument for CPE to remain voluntary. The two main reasons for this stance are the lack of evidence that CPE improves professional practice and the violation of adult learning principles inherent in mandatory education. Due to the paucity of information about this issue in medical radiation science professions arguments are drawn from across the health sciences professions. Needs assessment and evaluation of CPE programs will also be examined.