Premium
Compulsory Income Management in the Northern Territory – evaluating its impact
Author(s) -
Bray J Rob,
Gray Matthew,
Hand Kelly,
Katz Ilan
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
australian journal of social issues
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.417
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1839-4655
pISSN - 0157-6321
DOI - 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00356.x
Subject(s) - project commissioning , payment , government (linguistics) , welfare , income support , business , indigenous , public economics , disadvantage , scope (computer science) , cash transfers , harassment , publishing , cash , economics , economic growth , finance , political science , market economy , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , biology , computer science , law , macroeconomics , programming language
Australia has been experimenting with constraining the ways in which welfare recipients can spend their income support payments, limiting their ability to access cash and purchase some products. The policy objectives include to reduce spending on alcohol, gambling, pornography and tobacco in favour of meeting ‘basic’ family needs, especially for children, to limit the scope for financial harassment, encourage pro‐social behaviours, and build financial capabilities. In the logic of the programs these outcomes are expected to be manifest at the individual, family and community levels. The policy has primarily impacted on Indigenous Australians as a result of its geographic targeting, although a recent report has recommended a more stringent version of the program be introduced universally to all welfare recipients other than the aged. The largest of these experiments is ‘New Income Management’ in the Northern Territory, which has had more than 35,000 participants since its introduction in 2010. This article reports on the key findings of the major independent evaluation of New Income Management commissioned by the Australian Government.