Premium
Single‐Dose Antibiotic Therapy: What Has the Past Taught Us?
Author(s) -
Carbón Claude
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
the journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.92
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1552-4604
pISSN - 0091-2700
DOI - 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03870.x
Subject(s) - antibiotics , medicine , therapeutic index , penicillin , ototoxicity , pharmacology , regimen , toxicity , in vivo , pharmacokinetics , dose , intensive care medicine , chemotherapy , drug , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , cisplatin
The proper dosage schedule of antibiotics has generally been determined empirically, due to the difficulty of clinical trials. Initially, the dosage was chosen to allow high sustained levels > MIC in the blood. Antibiotics (β lactams, tetracyclins, macrolides) were given at high doses three to six times daily, whatever their kinetic properties. The data obtained by Eagle with β lactams in animal models of streptococcal and treponemal infections outlined the importance of interval between doses on the in vivo efficacy. They also showed that increasing the dose of penicillin had a positive effect on the bactericidal activity only through the persistence of effective levels (>MIC) at the site of infection. Further illustrations were given through experimental and clinical studies with β lactams or other compounds on different types of infections: LRTIs, UTIs, meningitis, and endocarditis. The importance of both dynamic (i.e., pattern of bactericidal effect) and kinetic (elimination half‐life) parameters was thus further identified. Information on toxicity with some compounds with a narrow therapeutic index, such as aminoglycosides, indicated that increasing the dose to enhance efficacy had some limitations. This led to numerous studies on the relations between concentration and toxicity, stating that nephro‐ or ototoxicity were not directly related to peak level in serum. Experimental studies showed that OD administration of aminoglycosides was both more efficient and less toxic than the multiple‐dose regimen of the same daily amount. Economic considerations progressively justified attempts to both reduce the dose and the work load related to multiple administrations. Development of oral compounds able to be given as initial therapy or as a quick alternative to parenteral administration raised the question of applicability to oral route of OD dosing. High bioavailability is required to ensure efficacy. Oral OD dosing may be discussed in more or less severe infectious processes and in some difficult‐to‐cure chronic infections.