Premium
Efficacy of Esmolol in the Treatment and Transfer of Patients with Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias to Alternate Oral Antiarrhythmic Agents
Author(s) -
Das Gopal,
Tschida Victor,
Gray Richard,
Dhurandhar Raja,
Lester Robert,
McGrew Frank,
Askenazi Joseph,
Kaplan Kerry,
Emanuele Martin,
Turlapaty Prasad,
Hua T. A.,
Hoff Julie,
Allin Douglas,
Laddu Atul
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
the journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.92
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1552-4604
pISSN - 0091-2700
DOI - 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1988.tb03209.x
Subject(s) - esmolol , medicine , antiarrhythmic agent , anesthesia , sinus rhythm , propranolol , enoximone , heart rate , cardiology , heart disease , blood pressure , atrial fibrillation , hemodynamics
The efficacy and safety of esmolol, a titratable intravenous beta‐adrenergic blocking agent with a short elimination hall‐life (t 1/2 = 9.0 min) was evaluated in a multicenter open‐label study for the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate greater than 100 bpm). The study also investigated the feasibility of transferring patients from esmolol to alternate oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of therapeutic response. Of the 113 patients studied, 95 (84%) achieved therapeutic response (reduction in heart rate of 15% or more or conversion to sinus rhythm). Most of these patients (93%) achieved the therapeutic response at esmolol doses of 200 μg/kg/min or lower. Transfer from esmolol to an oral antiarrhythmic agent(s) was studied in 76 patients. Alternate antiarrhythmic agents used in this study were digoxin (N = 25), propranolol (N = 21), verapamil (N = 10), metoprolol (N = 11), quinidine (N = 2), and a combination of two antiarrhythmic agents (N = 7). Sixty‐seven (88%) patients were successfully transferred to oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of the therapeutic response obtained with esmolol. The most frequent adverse effect observed during the study was hypotension, which resolved quickly (16 ± 14 min) either by decreasing the dose or by discontinuation of esmolol infusion. This study supports previous observations concerning the safety and efficacy of esmolol in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the majority of patients successfully treated with esmolol can be safely and effectively transferred to oral therapy with alternate antiarrhythmic agents.