z-logo
Premium
Ambiguous Insurance Wording Means Water Damage Must Be Covered
Author(s) -
Stiegler Mayo H.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal ‐ american water works association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.466
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1551-8833
pISSN - 0003-150X
DOI - 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2001.tb09284.x
Subject(s) - supreme court , property insurance , property (philosophy) , law , business , insurance policy , law and economics , actuarial science , forensic engineering , political science , casualty insurance , engineering , economics , philosophy , epistemology
Because of a policy's ambiguous wording, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia has ruled that an insurance company was liable for property damage resulting from the rupture of an underground water main.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here