Premium
Comparison of three TOC methodologies
Author(s) -
Kaplan Louis A.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal ‐ american water works association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.466
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1551-8833
pISSN - 0003-150X
DOI - 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb08929.x
Subject(s) - total organic carbon , dissolved organic carbon , environmental science , environmental chemistry , carbon fibers , sparging , combustion , organic matter , particulates , chemistry , mathematics , organic chemistry , algorithm , composite number
Using samples from a variety of US water sources, a study finds that different methodologies for analyzing total organic carbon yield equivalent data. The Stage 1 Disinfectants/Disinfection By‐products Rule requires analyses of total organic carbon (TOC) in drinking water sources. In this study, water samples from 102 watersheds across North America were used to compare three TOC methodologies. All analyses were performed on filtered samples, eliminating particles and permitting a focus on the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) constituents. High‐temperature combustion yielded significantly lower DOC concentration estimates than methods based on either wet chemical oxidation (9 percent difference) or ultraviolet‐promoted oxidation (10.5 percent difference). All three methodologies gave similar concentration estimates (no significant differences) after correction for a pH‐dependent loss of nonvolatile DOC during the external sparging of samples to remove inorganic carbon. The author concludes that current TOC technologies are capable of providing accurate and equivalent estimates of DOC concentrations; nonetheless, he contends that appropriate dissolved and particulate performance standards for TOC analyses would constitute an important tool for analysts in the drinking water industry.