Premium
Pennsylvania's filtration evaluation program
Author(s) -
Consonery Phil J.,
Greenfield Donald N.,
Lee Joseph J.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal ‐ american water works association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.466
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1551-8833
pISSN - 0003-150X
DOI - 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08277.x
Subject(s) - cryptosporidium , turbidity , filtration (mathematics) , environmental science , percentile , filter (signal processing) , water treatment , environmental engineering , zoology , veterinary medicine , mathematics , biology , statistics , medicine , engineering , ecology , electrical engineering , feces
By identifying weaknesses and optimizing treatment, Pennsylvania has greatly improved performance at its surface water plants. Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) initiated a statewide filter plant performance evaluation (FPPE) program for safe drinking water and completed 506 FPPEs at 290 surface water treatment plants. Only 39 percent of the plants were rated “acceptable” for performance at the program's inception in 1988, but by 1996 the percentage had increased to 91 percent—demonstrating that assistance to these systems could lead to successful improvements and decreased risks from waterborne protozoa. The percentage of positive Cryptosporidium (presumptive) samples of the finished water dropped from 35 percent in 1990 to <5 percent in 1996. Positive Cryptosporidium samples have remained below 5 percent in the last five years. The 90th percentile of particle count data showed a postfiltration count of 50/mL in the 3‐ to 18‐μm size range as the threshold for acceptable performance. Because optimized performance is a goal of the FPPE program, the concentrations of 3‐ to 18‐μm particles should remain below 10/mL to minimize breakthrough of pathogenic protozoa. The DEP considers turbidity of <0.1 ntu from each filter as a more optimum level of filter plant performance.