Premium
What Are the Options for Reuse?
Author(s) -
Crook James
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal ‐ american water works association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.466
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1551-8833
pISSN - 0003-150X
DOI - 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06481.x
Subject(s) - chapel , reuse , watson , management , engineering , suite , canyon , archaeology , library science , environmental ethics , art history , history , geography , cartography , waste management , philosophy , computer science , natural language processing , economics
Nonpotable uses of reclaimed water are well established, but indirect potable reuse is not as widely accepted. This Roundtable about water reuse was conducted June 20, 1995, in Anaheim, Calif. Discussion leader was James Crook, director of water reuse, Black & Veatch, 100 Cambridge Park Dr., Cambridge, MA 02140. Other participants were Robert C. Cooper, vice‐president, Bio‐Vir Laboratories, Stone Road, Benicia, CA 94557 and professor emeritus, University of California School of Public Health; Robert Hultquist, senior sanitary engineer with the California Department of Health Services, 2151 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704; James J. Morgan, Goldberger Professor of Environmental Engineering Science, California Institute of Technology, Caltech 138‐78, Pasadena, CA 91125; Daniel A. Okun, Kenan Professor of Environmental Engineering, Emeritus, University of North Carolina, CB 8060, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; Thomas G. Richardson, principal engineer, Montgomery Watson, 750 B St., Suite 1610, San Diego, CA 92101; and Ronald Young, general manager of the Irvine Ranch Water District, 15600 Sand Canyon Ave., Irvine, CA 92718.