z-logo
Premium
The D/DBP Rule: where did the numbers come from?
Author(s) -
Roberson J. Alan,
III John E. Cromwell,
Krasner Stuart W.,
McGuire Michael J.,
Owen Douglas M.,
Regli Stig,
Summers R. Scott
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal ‐ american water works association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.466
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1551-8833
pISSN - 0003-150X
DOI - 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1995.tb06434.x
Subject(s) - process (computing) , business , risk analysis (engineering) , environmental economics , computer science , economics , operating system
Number crunchers helped D/DBP reg‐neg participants balance chronic chemical risks and acute microbial risks. Because of the difficulties in balancing chemical and microbial risks in drinking water, a negotiated rule‐making process was used to develop the proposed Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts (D/DBP) Rule, the proposed Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, and the proposed Information Collection Rule. During the process, negotiators were aided by the Technologies Working Group, which quantified the costs and benefits of various treatment alternatives. This article summarizes the technical analyses of D/DBP exposure reductions and the national compliance costs that were developed to support the negotiated rule‐making process.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here