z-logo
Premium
Delayed pollination, stigma length, sex expression, and progeny sex ratio in spinach, Spinacea oleracea (Chenopodiaceae)
Author(s) -
Miglia Kathleen J.,
Freeman D. Carl
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12713.x
Subject(s) - biology , anthesis , sex ratio , stamen , pollination , botany , spinach , stigma (botany) , horticulture , sucrose , pollen , ecology , cultivar , population , demography , sociology , biochemistry
Delayed outcrossed pollination of female spinach plants ( Spinacea oleracea L.) resulted in increased stigma length and a male‐biased progeny sex ratio. One group of females was outcrossed 10–14 d after anthesis, a second group was never outcrossed, and a third group, the control, consisted of females that were outcrossed as soon as stigmas appeared. Stigma length was significantly greater for plants in the delayed and never outcrossed groups compared to the control. Furthermore, stigmas of virgin flowers grew until they were either pollinated or the plants produced anthers. Plants that were never outcrossed produced their own anthers and self pollinated. The resulting progeny were all female. The sons of the delayed outcrossed group produced more stamens, on average, than sons of the control group. The observed male‐biased sex ratio among the progeny of delayed outcrossed plants could be due to gametic selection. To test for this, plants were held virgin until their stigmas reached a length of at least 3 mm. These stigmas were then pollinated either distally or proximally. No significant difference was found between the progeny sex ratios of these two treatments. However, both sex ratios were more male biased than progeny of plants pollinated the day of anthesis (control group of the first experiment). We conclude that maternal factors, rather than gametophytic selection, may be responsible for the male‐biased sex ratio observed in the first experiment.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here