Premium
FLOWERING, SEX RATIOS, POLLEN‐OVULE RATIOS, FRUIT SET, AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT OF A DIOECIOUS TREE, MYRISTICA INSIPIDA (MYRISTICACEAE), IN TWO DIFFERENT RAIN FOREST COMMUNITIES
Author(s) -
Armstrong Joseph E.,
Irvine Anthony K.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb11287.x
Subject(s) - biology , dioecy , pollen , pollination , ovule , botany , stamen , sex ratio , population , reproductive success , horticulture , reproduction , plant reproductive morphology , sexual reproduction , ecology , demography , sociology
The flowering of Myristica insipida R. Br. was studied in two rain forest communities in northern Queensland. This dioecious, subcanopy tree had a male‐biased sex ratio at both study sites. In the lowland population the male‐bias could be attributed to males (trees producing staminate flowers) starting to flower at a smaller average size than females (trees producing pistillate flowers). There were no intersexual differences in spacing or distribution within the study sites. Males trees flowered earlier, flowered longer, and produced over twice as many flowers as females during the study season. Although the onset of flowering was rather variable, 18–22 days following heavy rains, most trees had a synchronous period of maximum flowering. Pollination manipulations determined that there was no fruit development without pollination, and that increasing pollen loads resulted in increased fruit set with diminishing effect. Taking into account the sex‐ratios and intersexual differences in flower production, the pollen‐ovule ratio was calculated to be 16,000–19,000. Male trees were found to expend more energy on flowering than female trees. Open‐pollination resulted in 1.0% of female flowers setting fruit. The much greater cost of fruit production resulted in females expending 421% more energy on reproduction than males. Fruit and seed production were judged to be pollination‐limited. Nonetheless, this species exhibited several characteristics that are predicted if dioecy evolved by means of sexual selection.