Premium
ANAEROBIC SUBSTRATE TOLERANCE IN SPOROBOLUS VIRGINICUS (L.) KUNTH.
Author(s) -
Donovan Lisa A.,
Gallagher John L.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1984.tb11999.x
Subject(s) - aerenchyma , biology , rhizome , anaerobic exercise , biomass (ecology) , stolon , anaerobic respiration , botany , aeration , agronomy , ecology , physiology
The purpose of this study was to determine if and how the two genetically distinct forms, marsh and dune, of Sporobolus virginicus (L.) Kunth. tolerate anaerobic substrates. The treatments in the hydroponic study, conducted in the greenhouse for approximately 6 months, involved growing the marsh and dune forms in aerobic, anaerobic, and alternating aeration treatments. Plants were examined for morphological and physiological responses to the aeration treatments. In response to the continuous anaerobic treatment, the dune form of S. virginicus exhibited increased stolon biomass, but no difference of total biomass or rhizome aerenchyma when compared with the aerobic treatment. In response to alternating aeration, rhizome aerenchyma increased, total biomass decreased, and stolon biomass remained constant. Belowground transport of oxygen enabled the root tissue in all of the aeration treatments to maintain aerobic respiration. The marsh form grown in the alternating aeration treatment had the same total biomass but more rhizome aerenchyma when compared to the aerobic treatment. Growth in the continuous anaerobic treatment resulted in a reduction of total biomass and increased rhizome arenchyma. Marsh form roots did not appear to be respiring anaerobically or producing ethanol or additional malate at the time of harvest; however, root respiration was higher in the anaerobic and alternating treatments. The marsh and dune forms of S. virginicus were able to adjust morphologically or physiologically or to use existing morphological features to tolerate anaerobic substrates. Thus, it appears that the distribution of the two forms of S. virginicus found in coastal sand dunes and in salt marshes is not limited by differences in ability to tolerate waterlogged soils.