Premium
ANALYSIS OF STARCH ACCUMULATION AND GERMINATION IN ONOCLEA SPORES
Author(s) -
Towill Leslie R.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1980.tb07626.x
Subject(s) - germination , starch , dcmu , fluence , photosynthesis , biology , photosystem ii , spore germination , spore , botany , photosystem , biophysics , photosynthetic efficiency , irradiation , horticulture , food science , physics , nuclear physics
Previous studies have shown that low fluences of light accelerate starch accumulation and enhance germination of Onoclea spores. Fluence response curves for induction of starch accumulation were compared with fluence response curves for enhancement of germination in order to determine if the two photoresponses in Onoclea spores have a common photoreceptor. Fluence response curves indicate that both responses were proportional to the log of the fluence and that the relative fluence efficiencies of the four wavelength regions tested were similar for induction of both germination and starch accumulation. Red (600–720 nm) irradiation was the most efficient, while green (500–600 nm), blue (400–520 nm), and far‐red (720–900 nm) irradiations showed a decreasing order of efficiency for induction of the responses. A correlation coefficient between the amount of starch accumulated as a result of red irradiation and the final percent germination was calculated to be 0.964. These results support the hypothesis that a common photoreceptor mediates both photoinduced germination and starch accumulation. 3‐(3,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,1‐dimethylurea (DCMU) inhibits photosynthesis by blocking the flow of electrons from Photosystem II to Photosystem I. At 0.1 mM DCMU failed to inhibit both photoinduced starch acumulation and germination. This result and the greater efficiency of red than blue light, the low fluence functional for induction, and the fluence dependency argue against the participation of photosynthesis in photoinduced starch accumulation. A similar conclusion has been previously drawn for photoenhancement of Onoclea spore germination. Additionally, the effects 0.01–1.0 m m cycloheximide and 100 μl/l ethylene on photoinduced starch accumulation were investigated. Neither agent inhibited starch accumulation, whereas both substances inhibited germination 70–90% when applied at a time coincidental with the period of rapid starch accumulation. These results indicate that the photoinduction of starch accumulation does not have an ethylene sensitive stage nor does it require protein synthesis as does photoenhancement of germination of Onoclea spores.