Premium
MECHANISM OF SEED DORMANCY IN AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA
Author(s) -
Willemsen Roger W.,
Rice Elroy L.
Publication year - 1972
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1972.tb10089.x
Subject(s) - germination , gibberellin , biology , seed dormancy , scarification , dormancy , stratification (seeds) , abscisic acid , ambrosia artemisiifolia , botany , auxin , horticulture , ragweed , biochemistry , allergy , gene , immunology
Dormancy in Ambrosia artemisiifolia seeds was broken by 8 weeks of stratification. Germination of nondormant seeds was greater in light than in continuous darkness. Embryos of freshly harvested seeds were nondormant. Leaching and scarification did not stimulate germination of the dormant seeds. Exogenous gibberellin (GA 3 ) slightly increased germination of intact dormant seeds, and the effect was greatly increased by scarification. Germination was greater in the light in both tests. Exogenous indoleacetic acid did not stimulate germination of dormant seeds. Endogenous gibberellin and auxin content increased during stratification, and there was also a significant increase in GA during post‐stratification at a favorable germination temperature. Inhibitors in the dormant seeds decreased during stratification and post‐stratification. The high concentration of chlorogenic acid present in dormant seeds increased slightly during stratification. An unknown phenol very similar to chlorogenic acid in fluorescence and U.V. absorption significantly increased after 2 weeks of stratification. A significant decrease in the concentration of a second unidentified phenol occurred after 2 weeks of stratification. It is proposed that dormancy in Ambrosia artemisiifolia may be controlled by an inhibitor‐promoter complex. The dormant seed is characterized by high inhibitor and low promoter levels. In the nondormant seed the balance was shifted to favor the promoter. Evidence suggests that the inhibitor involved may be abscisic acid and the promoters may be gibberellin and auxin. The content of auxin may be partially controlled by the concentration of phenols.