Premium
ON THE METHODS OF EXPERIMENTAL TAXONOMY
Author(s) -
Müntzing Arne
Publication year - 1969
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1969.tb09727.x
Subject(s) - biology , meiosis , chromosome , apomixis , reproductive isolation , sterility , genetics , synapsis , loss of heterozygosity , taxonomy (biology) , aneuploidy , ploidy , polyploid , hybrid , evolutionary biology , botany , allele , gene , population , demography , sociology
By studying seedling progenies from individual plants it may be decided whether the material under investigation is allogamous, autogamous or apomictic. Chromosome counts disclose whether the material is cytologically stable or variable. If variation occurs it may be a question of polyploidy or aneuploidy. Aneuploidy may either be an occasional consequence of polyploidy or it may represent dysploidy and the formation of new basic numbers. Chromosome counts combined with measurements of chromosome size may reveal cases of pseudopolyploidy of the kind first observed in Luzula . If chromosome morphology is different between two taxa this indicates reproductive isolation. Different species usually differ with regard to their chromosome structure. Studies of meiosis are desirable in polyploids in order to distinguish between auto‐ and alloploidy. Cases of genic control of meiosis in polyploids of Phleum and Triticum demonstrate, however, that partial or complete homology between genomes does not always result in multivalent formation. Apparent alloploids may in reality be more or less autoploid. Incompatibility is not a reliable criterion of species differentiation. Strong or absolute barriers between diploids and autotetraploids may have purely quantitative causes. Hybrid sterility is not always a reliable measure of the degree of genetic difference between the parents, but may be caused by heterozygosity for chromosomal rearrangements. Cytological and experimental methods are, nevertheless, indispensable tools in plant taxonomy.