Premium
LEAF RESISTANCE TO WATER VAPOR TRANSFER IN SUCCULENT PLANTS: EFFECT OF THERMOPERIOD
Author(s) -
Ting Irwin P.,
Thompson MargaretLee Dean,
Dugger W. M.
Publication year - 1967
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1967.tb06916.x
Subject(s) - biology , nocturnal , photoperiodism , botany , horticulture , light intensity , ecology , physics , optics
Leaf resistance (R L ) of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana to water vapor transfer was determined with a resistance hygrometer. The diurnal leaf‐resistance change followed a normal pattern (i.e., low in light and higher in dark) when plants were pretreated with cool thermoperiods or with thermoperiods having little diurnal temperature fluctuation. Large diurnal temperature fluctuations (30‐18, 26‐15 C) resulted in apparent nocturnal stomatal opening. Nocturnal stomatal opening was more apparent than real since leaf‐resistance measurements indicated day stomatal closing rather than complete night opening. Low nocturnal leaf resistances ( < 10 sec/cm) were not measured in the dark; however, resistances tended to decrease toward the end of the dark period indicating some degree of nocturnal stomatal opening. Leaf resistances were generally higher than those reported for nonsucculent plants. The data suggested that gaseous diffusion (Q) into or out of the leaves of K. blossfeldiana would be adequately described by an equation of the form, Q = D Δ e R L −1 . There was little or no indication that physiological long days (15 min of 660 mμ light in the middle of a 16‐hr dark period), which prevented flowering and reduced organic acid accumulation, significantly affected leaf resistance. It was concluded that the photoperiod response effects of dark CO 2 fixation were probably not due to leaf‐resistance changes and, therefore, not due to stomatal aperture changes.