Premium
PHOTOPERIODISM IN AMARANTHUS CAUDATUS. I. A RE‐EXAMINATION OF THE PHOTOPERIODIC RESPONSE
Author(s) -
Zabka George G.
Publication year - 1961
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1961.tb11599.x
Subject(s) - primordium , inflorescence , biology , photoperiodism , botany , long day , obligate , horticulture , biochemistry , gene
Z abka , G eorge G. (State U. Iowa, Iowa City.) Photoperiodism in Amaranthus caudatus. I. A re‐examination of the photoperiodic response. Amer. Jour. Bot. 48(1): 21–28. Illus. 1961.—Under the conditions described in this study, Amaranthus caudatus is not subject to inductive short days until it has reached its “sensitive period” or age which is approximately 30 days after the time of germination. Beyond this sensitive period, 2 days are sufficient to initiate inflorescence primordia. Macroscopic identification of this response is possible 2–3 days later, if the plants are retained on short photoperiods. Continued development of the inflorescence is also promoted by short days. This species will also initiate inflorescence primordia on long days of 18 hours duration approximately 60 days beyond germination. Consequently, this is not an obligate short‐day plant as previously described. Although A. caudatus will initiate primordia on long days, subsequent normal development of the inflorescence proceeds only under short photoperiods. Plants initiating primordia on long or short photoperiods and then placed on long photoperiods will produce inflorescences which are stubby, generally recurved and spread at the apices. Subsequent flowering and seeding is also delayed. Plants initiating primordia on long days and then placed on short days develop mature inflorescences rapidly but they are divided at the apices and exhibit numerous basal branches.