Premium
The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with visual illusion in neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury: An evoked potentials and quantitative thermal testing study
Author(s) -
Kumru H.,
Soler D.,
Vidal J.,
Navarro X.,
Tormos J.M.,
PascualLeone A.,
VallsSole J.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
european journal of pain
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.305
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1532-2149
pISSN - 1090-3801
DOI - 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00167.x
Subject(s) - neuropathic pain , transcranial direct current stimulation , spinal cord injury , medicine , anesthesia , visual analogue scale , evoked potential , illusion , stimulation , audiology , spinal cord , psychology , physical therapy , neuroscience , psychiatry
Abstract Background Neuropathic pain ( NP ) is common in spinal cord injury ( SCI ) patients. One of its manifestations is a lowering of pain perception threshold in quantitative thermal testing ( QTT ) in dermatomes rostral to the injury level. Transcranial direct current stimulation ( tDCS ) combined with visual illusion ( VI ) improves pain in SCI patients. We studied whether pain relief with tDCS + VI intervention is accompanied by a change in contact heat‐ evoked potentials ( CHEPs ) or in QTT . Methods We examined 18 patients with SCI and NP before and after 2 weeks of daily tDCS + VI intervention. Twenty SCI patients without NP and 14 healthy subjects served as controls. We assessed NP intensity using a numerical rating scale ( NRS ) and determined heat and pain thresholds with thermal probes. CHEPs were recorded to stimuli applied at C4 level, and subjects rated their perception of evoked pain using NRS during CHEPs . Results Thirteen patients reported a mean decrease of 50% in the NRS for NP after tDCS + VI . Evoked pain perception was significantly higher than in the other two groups, and reduced significantly together with CHEPs amplitude after tDCS + VI with respect to baseline. Pain perception threshold was significantly lower than in the other two groups before tDCS + VI intervention, and increased significantly afterwards. Conclusion Two weeks of tDCS + VI induced significant changes in CHEPs , evoked pain and heat pain threshold in SCI patients with NP . These neurophysiological tests might be objective biomarkers of treatment effects for NP in patients with SCI .