Premium
Shame, Realisation and Restitution: The Ethics of Restorative Practice
Author(s) -
Jenkins Alan
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of family therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.297
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1467-8438
pISSN - 0814-723X
DOI - 10.1002/j.1467-8438.2006.tb00713.x
Subject(s) - restorative justice , shame , forgiveness , remorse , context (archaeology) , restitution , psychology , action (physics) , psychotherapist , realisation , intervention (counseling) , sociology , social psychology , criminology , political science , law , paleontology , psychiatry , biology , physics , quantum mechanics
In this article, I want to highlight the ethics of restorative practice in therapeutic intervention with men who have abused family members. The term restorative action is commonly evoked in the aftermath of abuse, especially in the context of attempts to re‐establish respectful relationships between family members. I will critique popular ideas concerning remorse, forgiveness, pardoning and reconciliation, and pose possibilities for ethical practices of restorative action.