Premium
Validity of the UKCAT in Applicant Selection and Predicting Exam Performance in UK Dental Students
Author(s) -
Lala Rizwana,
Wood Duncan,
Baker Sarah
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1930-7837
pISSN - 0022-0337
DOI - 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.9.tb05588.x
Subject(s) - aptitude , psychology , test (biology) , selection (genetic algorithm) , regression analysis , medical education , dental education , entrance exam , predictive validity , educational measurement , medicine , clinical psychology , pedagogy , statistics , developmental psychology , curriculum , computer science , mathematics , paleontology , artificial intelligence , biology
The United Kingdom's Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) aims to assess candidates’ “natural talent” for dentistry. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the UKCAT for dental school applicant selection. The relationship of the UKCAT with demographic and academic variables was examined, assessing if the likelihood of being offered a place at a UK dental school was predicted by demographic factors and academic selection tools (predicted grades and existing school results). Finally, the validity of these selection tools in predicting first–year dental exam performance was assessed. Correlational and regression analyses showed that females and poorer students were more likely to have lower UKCAT scores. Gender and social class did not, however, predict first–year dental exam performance. UKCAT scores predicted the likelihood of the candidate being offered a place in the dental course; however, they did not predict exam performance during the first year of the course. Indeed, the only predictor of dental exam performance was existing school results. These findings argue against the use of the UKCAT as the sole determinant in dental applicant selection, instead highlighting the value of using existing school results.