Premium
Obstacles to Implementing Evidence‐Based Dentistry: A Focus Group‐Based Study
Author(s) -
Hannes Karin,
Norré David,
Goedhuys Jo,
Naert Ignace,
Aertgeerts Bert
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1930-7837
pISSN - 0022-0337
DOI - 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2008.72.6.tb04539.x
Subject(s) - flemish , focus group , government (linguistics) , medical education , health care , psychology , qualitative research , evidence based dentistry , medicine , nursing , alternative medicine , political science , sociology , social science , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology , pathology , history , anthropology , law
In many countries, questions have been raised about the use of evidence‐based practice (EBP) in oral health care. The call for an increase in EBP seems to face many obstacles. Only limited empirical studies address these obstacles. We present a qualitative study that explores the obstacles that Flemish (Belgian, Dutch‐speaking) dentists experience in the implementation of EBP in routine clinical work. We collected data from discussions in focus groups. Seventy‐nine dentists participated. The data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. Three major categories of obstacles were identified. These categories relate to obstacles in 1) evidence, 2) partners in health care (medical doctors, patients, and government), and 3) the field of dentistry. Our findings suggest that educators should provide communication skills to aid decision making, address the technical dimensions of dentistry, promote lifelong learning, and close the gap between academics and general practitioners (dentists) in order to create mutual understanding. The obstacles identified are considered useful to support future quantitative research that can be generalized to a broader group.