z-logo
Premium
Bone tissue interface
Author(s) -
Roberts WE
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1930-7837
pISSN - 0022-0337
DOI - 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1988.52.12.tb02283.x
Subject(s) - osseointegration , fixation (population genetics) , bone remodeling , dentistry , periodontal fiber , biomedical engineering , materials science , anatomy , medicine , implant , surgery , population , environmental health
High resolution microradiography and multiple fluorochrome labeling are definitive histological methods for assessing the mechanism and timing of osseous healing, maturation, and adaptation. Two fundamental types of bone interface have been described for endosseous dental implants: (1) fibro‐osseous integration (“pseudo‐periodontal ligament”) and (2) rigid osseous fixation (“osseointegration”). No definitive bone interface studies with modern physiological methods have been reported for fibro‐osseous integration. Rigid osseous fixation has been investigated in cortical bone implantation sites. The initial healing reaction involves predominantly bone modeling at the periosteal and endosteal surfaces, i.e., a woven bone callus fills with lamellae by the process of lamellar compaction. Nonvital osseous interface and adjacent compacta are replaced by bone remodeling (turnover). As assessed with high resolution microradiography, “clinically successful” specimens had less than half of the intraosseous interface in direct contact with bone. Extrapolation from animal data suggests that endosseous implants can be provisionally loaded at about 18 weeks, but full maturation of the interface requires approximately one year.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here