Premium
Response of Photosynthesis Models to Light Limitation
Author(s) -
Wallace Brett B.,
Hamilton David P.,
Patterson John C.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
internationale revue der gesamten hydrobiologie und hydrographie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1522-2632
pISSN - 0020-9309
DOI - 10.1002/iroh.19960810213
Subject(s) - irradiance , phytoplankton , photosynthesis , biomass (ecology) , chlorophyll a , environmental science , production (economics) , chlorophyll , biological system , mathematics , ecology , biology , nutrient , botany , physics , optics , macroeconomics , economics
An investigation into the effect of time step on a common photosynthesis algorithm reveals that the predicted phytoplankton production and biomass depend strongly on the length of the time step. This time step dependence is due to the assumption that a light limitation factor derived from integrating the irradiance over the time step is equivalent to the integrated light limitation factor over the time step. This subtle inaccuracy in defining the factor for light limited phytoplankton production produces a substantial difference in the biomass estimates derived from the two models. To illustrate the difference, the light limitation factor integrated over the time step is implemented in the one dimensional water quality model DYRESM‐WQ. The new version of DYRESM‐WQ is used to simulate chlorophyll N concentrations in Prospect Reservoir, New South Wales. These results are compared to concentrations predicted using the original algorithm. The comparison shows that the new algorithm for phytoplankton production is relatively insensitive to time step, which decreases the difficulty of calibrating the model for chlorophyll a .