Premium
The Influence of Pack Size and Position, Leaf Type, and Shredder Access on the Processing Rate of Atherosperma moschatum Leaves in an Australian Cool Temperate Rainforest Stream
Author(s) -
Campbell Ian C.,
Enierga Gina M.,
Fuchshuber Lilian
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
internationale revue der gesamten hydrobiologie und hydrographie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1522-2632
pISSN - 0020-9309
DOI - 10.1002/iroh.19940790406
Subject(s) - litter , temperate climate , rainforest , environmental science , horticulture , biology , botany , ecology
Factors affecting the processing rate of packs of southern sassafras ( Atherosperma moschatum ) leaves were investigated in an Australian cool temperate rainforest stream pool. Processing rate was strongly influenced by pack weight fitting a linear inverse relationship. Processing was not significantly (p>0.05) affected by whether the packs were placed on bricks or free on the stream bed. Free packs, but not packs on bricks, were processed more rapidly near the bank than in midstream (p = 0.050). Packs placed in 300 μm mesh bags, with one side unsealed were processed at the same rate as packs attached to bricks or free on the stream bed, but packs in sealed 300 μm mesh bags were processed significantly more slowly (p<10 −4 ). Abscissed leaves were processed significantly more slowly than fresh leaves (p<10 −5 ) and at a rate not significantly different to leaves sealed in mesh bags (p = 0.197). There was no consistent pattern of difference between processing rates in summer and winter. The results indicate that the size of litter packs may be a more important factor in influencing processing rate estimates than the method of attachment of the packs. The slow rate of processing of abscissed leaves compared with fresh leaves indicates that they were at most, slightly influenced by stream shredders. The absence of a consistent pattern of difference between summer and winter processing rates is consistent with the results of previous litter processing studies from southeastern Australia although no clear causal factor can be identified.