Premium
COMPARISON OF ROTATION AND WATER DISTRIBUTION UNIFORMITY USING DISPERSION DEVICES FOR IMPACT AND ROTARY SPRINKLERS
Author(s) -
Issaka Zakaria,
Li Hong,
Jiang Yue,
Tang Pan,
Chao Chen
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
irrigation and drainage
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.421
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1531-0361
pISSN - 1531-0353
DOI - 10.1002/ird.2375
Subject(s) - distribution uniformity , dispersion (optics) , rotation (mathematics) , rotational speed , soil gradation , materials science , environmental science , mathematics , optics , physics , soil science , geometry , engineering , composite material , mechanical engineering , soil water
The study provides laboratory testing of the effect of dispersion devices on the rotation and water distribution uniformity for impact and rotary spray sprinklers. A MatLab program was used to simulate the overlapped spray quadrants and visualize the variations in water distribution. Results showed rotation completion times of 15.5, 14.8, 15.1, and 14.9 s were not significantly different ( p < 0.05) between the quadrants for the impact sprinkler with the F 2 dispersion device. However, the rotary sprinkler with the R 2 dispersion device produced larger rotation completion times of 20.2, 18.2, 20.4 and 17.3 s with significant differences ( p > 0.05) between the quadrants under a pressure of 200 kPa. The rotary sprinkler with R 2 gave large deviations (0.0–2.8 mm h −1 ) in water distribution, but the deviations from the impact sprinkler with F 2 were smaller (0.0–1.7 mm h −1 ), indicating a more uniform water distribution. Insignificant differences ( p < 0.05) occurred between the coefficient of uniformity (CU) of the overlapped quadrants with the same spacing, which fell within the acceptable CU of 75% for the sprinklers. The study revealed that the impact sprinkler equipped with F 2 performed as efficiently as the rotary sprinkler with R 2 from the perspective of rotation stability and water distribution uniformity. Findings from this study could be significant and useful for optimizing water dispersion devices for improving the performance of impact sprinklers under low‐pressure conditions. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.