Premium
Neurofeedback using functional spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Hinds Oliver,
Wighton Paul,
Dylan Tisdall M.,
Hess Aaron,
Breiter Hans,
Kouwe André
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of imaging systems and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.359
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1098-1098
pISSN - 0899-9457
DOI - 10.1002/ima.22088
Subject(s) - neurofeedback , functional magnetic resonance imaging , computer science , voxel , artificial intelligence , functional near infrared spectroscopy , nuclear magnetic resonance , pattern recognition (psychology) , physics , neuroscience , electroencephalography , psychology , cognition , prefrontal cortex
Neurofeedback based on real‐time measurement of the blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) signal has potential for treatment of neurological disorders and behavioral enhancement. Commonly used methods are based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sequences that sacrifice speed and accuracy for whole‐brain coverage, which is unnecessary in most applications. We present multivoxel functional spectroscopy (MVFS): a system for computing the BOLD signal from multiple volumes of interest (VOI) in real‐time that improves speed and accuracy of neurofeedback. MVFS consists of a FS pulse sequence, a BOLD reconstruction component, a neural activation estimator, and a stimulus system. The FS pulse sequence is a single‐voxel, magnetic resonance spectroscopy sequence without water suppression that has been extended to allow acquisition of a different VOI at each repetition and real‐time subject head motion compensation. The BOLD reconstruction component determines the T2* decay rate, which is directly related to BOLD signal strength. The neural activation estimator discounts nuisance signals and scales the activation relative to the amount of ROI noise. Finally, the neurofeedback system presents neural activation‐dependent stimuli to experimental subjects with an overall delay of less than 1 s. Here, we present the MVFS system, validation of certain components, examples of its usage in a practical application, and a direct comparison of FS and echo‐planar imaging BOLD measurements. We conclude that in the context of realtime BOLD imaging, MVFS can provide superior accuracy and temporal resolution compared with standard fMRI methods. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Imaging Syst Technol, 24, 138–148, 2014