Premium
The impact of a segregated team roster on obstetric and gynecology services in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic in a tertiary care center in India
Author(s) -
Mahey Reeta,
Sharma Aparna,
Kumari Archana,
Kachhawa Garima,
Gupta Monica,
Meena Jyoti,
Bhatla Neerja
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1002/ijgo.13408
Subject(s) - medicine , pandemic , covid-19 , isolation (microbiology) , health care , medical emergency , obstetrics and gynaecology , tertiary care , contact tracing , emergency medicine , family medicine , pregnancy , infectious disease (medical specialty) , genetics , disease , pathology , microbiology and biotechnology , economics , biology , economic growth
Abstract Objective To determine the impact of roster reorganization on ensuring uninterrupted services while providing necessary relief to healthcare workers (HCW) in the obstetrics department of a tertiary care center amid the COVID‐19 outbreak. Methods The COVID‐19 rostering response began in April 2020 and evolved in two phases: (1) development of new areas for screening and managing suspected/positive cases of COVID‐19; and (2) team segregation according to area of work. The impact of these changes on HCWs and patients was assessed 3 months later. Results Developing separate areas helped to minimize the risk of exposure of patients and HCWs to those with COVID‐19. Residents and consultants worked intensively in clinical areas for 1 week followed by 1–2 weeks of non‐clinical or standby assignments, providing adequate opportunity for isolation. Frequent re‐evaluation of the roster was nevertheless required as the pandemic progressed. Segregating teams vertically significantly reduced the number of contacts identified on contact tracing and quarantine leaves, while maintaining patient satisfaction with no increase in adverse events. Residents found the roster to be “smart” and “pandemic‐appropriate.” Conclusion The “COVID emergency roster” helped ensure quality care with minimum risk of exposure and sufficient breaks for physical and psychological recovery of HCWs.